Contributor: Dennis McCullough

As consumer demand for cleaner labels and minimally processed foods grows, food and beverage (F&B) manufacturers face challenging crossroads. While striving to meet the call for fewer preservatives and more natural ingredients, manufacturers must also ensure product safety, maintain quality, and prevent contamination. The stakes are high: foodborne illnesses caused by bacteria, viruses, and other contaminants affect millions of people each year, while product recalls due to contamination or spoilage can severely damage a brand’s reputation and bottom line.

In this context, micro risk assessments (MRAs) have emerged as an invaluable tool for manufacturers seeking to navigate these complexities. By taking a holistic approach to risk management, MRAs go beyond traditional methods like HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points) to address vulnerabilities in facility design, operational and validation procedures. Below, we explore the role MRAs play in modern manufacturing and how they empower businesses to balance safety, quality, and innovation in the clean-label era.

Understanding microbiological hazards in manufacturing

The most common microbiological hazards in food and beverage manufacturing fall into two categories:

  • Pathogenic hazards. Organisms such as Salmonella, E. coli, and Listeria pose direct threats to consumer health. Regulations like the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) and FDA CFR Title 21 require manufacturers to monitor and mitigate these risks using structured approaches like HACCP and pathogen screening programs.
  • Spoilage organisms. While less dangerous to health, spoilage organisms can impact product quality, leading to rejected batches and lost revenue. These risks are particularly relevant in clean-label manufacturing, where the reduction of preservatives increases susceptibility to spoilage.

MRAs address these challenges by evaluating every aspect of a manufacturing site, from facility design to microbiological testing. Unlike traditional risk assessments, MRAs take a broader view, identifying additional contamination sources such as compressed air, water systems, effectiveness of product validation (including cleaning and sanitization),and even the adequacy of training programs.

How micro risk assessments add value

For decades, food and beverage manufacturers relied on traditional methods such as product testing, pathogen screening, and intrinsic product factors like pH, salt content, or low water activity to control microbial risks. While these approaches were effective for highly preserved products, they left significant gaps as consumer demand shifted toward cleaner labels and minimally processed foods.

MRAs fill these gaps by offering a proactive and holistic approach to identifying and mitigating microbial risks. Rather than focusing exclusively on finished product testing or specific critical control points, MRAs examine the entire manufacturing ecosystem. This includes assessing facility design, site utilities, operational processes, and the adequacy of microbiological testing protocols.

By tackling both visible risks and hidden vulnerabilities—such as contamination from compressed air, water systems, or ineffective sanitation procedures—MRAs provide actionable insights that traditional methods might overlook. This comprehensive perspective empowers manufacturers to implement preventive measures, reducing the likelihood of contamination or spoilage and ultimately improving both product safety and quality.

This comprehensive perspective enables manufacturers to implement preventive measures, reducing the likelihood of contamination or spoilage and ultimately improving product safety and quality.

MRAs can be especially important for manufacturers with aging facilities that were designed to earlier standards and protocols, as these facilities may not account for modern risks associated with today’s cleaner-label production methods.

Additionally, MRAs bridge gaps between research and development (R&D) teams, who develop test methods and protocols, and manufacturing sites, where those protocols are implemented. This includes evaluating the training and qualifications of technicians, as well as the overall microbiological understanding within a site. Such evaluations strengthen the effectiveness of internal risk assessment systems, like HACCP, which may otherwise overlook critical factors due to limited alignment or expertise.

Challenges and opportunities in implementing MRAs

Despite their benefits, implementing MRAs is not without challenges. Key obstacles include:

  • Knowledge gaps. Many manufacturing sites lack staff with deep microbiological expertise. Testing technicians are often trained for specific tasks but may not have the broader knowledge needed to identify microbial risks comprehensively.
  • The absence of aligned standards can hinder the effectiveness of MRAs. Each site may have different hygienic requirements, making it difficult to establish consistent benchmarks.
  • Leadership buy-in. Effective MRAs require support from leadership to allocate resources and empower corrective actions. If leadership has traditionally held a reactive stance toward dealing with contamination incidents after they occur, it can require a shift in both mindset and procedures to proactively address risks.

To overcome these challenges, manufacturers can take several steps:

  • Leverage external expertise. Partnering with experienced professionals—like Salas O’Brien—for independent MRAs provides objectivity and rigor to the process. External assessments can overcome biases and blind spots in internal evaluations.
  • Invest in training. Offering tailored microbiology and hygiene training for all levels of the organization—from operators to leadership—ensures that every team member understands their role in maintaining product safety. These programs should address the specific needs of different roles, from sanitation practices to strategic oversight.
  • Adopt modern tools. Technologies such as environmental monitoring systems provide actionable data that enhances the precision and effectiveness of MRAs. These tools help manufacturers better understand environmental conditions and pinpoint contamination risks.
  • Incorporate visual reporting. During MRAs, consultants can document issues such as insufficient sanitation, flawed facility design, or contamination-prone areas through photos. These visuals make it easier to justify corrective actions, prioritize improvements, and foster a shared understanding among teams. Combined with video training, visual reporting helps bring abstract concepts to life, making it a practical and impactful resource for both risk assessments and staff education.

How Salas O’Brien can help

As manufacturers strive to meet consumer demand for cleaner labels and natural products, the importance of robust risk management has never been greater. Micro risk assessments offer a proven pathway for companies to identify and mitigate risks before they escalate.

Salas O’Brien has experts in hygienic design with deep experience in a wide range of manufacturing environments for food, beverage, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical / nutraceutical production. Reach out to ask about an MRA for your facility.

For media inquiries on this article, reach out to Stacy Lake, Director of Corporate Communications

Contributors
Dennis McCullough, MS, CPP

Dennis McCullough, MS, CPP

Dennis McCullough is a highly respected leader in hygienic design with over 45 years of experience providing expert guidance to clients in a range of industries. From consumer products to food and beverage, pet care, cosmetics, and protein companies, Dennis has helped clients to develop innovative solutions for their manufacturing and processing facilities. He currently serves as a Senior Vice President at Salas O’Brien. Contact him at [email protected]

All Posts