Contributors: Nick Turner, John Murphy, David Mackedanz

Stainless steel is the backbone of hygienic manufacturing. In food, beverage, and pharma, it’s the only material that can withstand aggressive CIP and SIP cleaning cycles, resist corrosion from caustic chemicals, and maintain the surface integrity regulators demand. Every mixer, vessel, conveyor, and process pipe in a modern dairy, brewery, or pharma cleanroom exists because stainless makes hygienic production possible.

None of that is news to anyone running these facilities. What’s less discussed is how often stainless steel fabrication goes sideways, and what that actually costs.

The failure modes are well documented within operations teams but rarely surface in vendor conversations. Stress cracking from repeated thermal cycling. Distortion from improper weld sequencing. Pitting from carbon contamination introduced in a shop that also works mild steel. These aren’t theoretical risks. They’re recurring maintenance headaches that quietly eat into uptime, product safety, and equipment life. A single bacterial harborage point caused by substandard weld quality or poor surface finish can shut down a production line worth  millions per day in lost output.

Meanwhile, the skilled labor pipeline for stainless fabrication is thinning. The welders, polishers, and fabricators who understand how 316L behaves under thermal stress, who can achieve a consistent No. 4 or electropolished finish, who know that welding stainless uphill versus downhill produces different stress profiles, are aging out of the workforce. Fewer young tradespeople are entering the field, and the learning curve is steep. This isn’t a material you learn on carbon steel and then transfer over. Stainless is, as one veteran fabricator put it, a finicky metal that demands respect.

The result is a market where general fabrication shops take on stainless work they aren’t equipped to do well, and manufacturers absorb the downstream consequences.

The real risk isn’t the weld. It’s the gap between engineering and fabrication.

Most facility operators frame stainless fabrication as a procurement problem: find a shop, send them a print, get a piece of equipment back. But the persistent quality and reliability issues across the industry point to something more fundamental.

The core problem is the separation between the people who design process equipment and the people who build it.

When engineering and fabrication operate independently, critical information gets lost in translation. An engineer may specify a double-walled, heated-and-cooled mixer with augers that handle product at near-frozen temperatures on one end and SIP sterilization temperatures on the other. The thermal stress profile of that equipment is extreme. Without fabrication input during design, the engineering team may not account for how weld placement, material thickness transitions, and joint geometry will perform across thousands of heating and cooling cycles. The fabricator, in turn, builds to the print without fully understanding the operational context that should inform how the equipment is assembled.

This gap creates a cycle that operators know too well: equipment arrives, passes initial inspection, goes into service, and starts developing cracks or corrosion within months. The fix is usually another work order, another shutdown, another patch job by a maintenance crew that’s already stretched thin.

The paradigm shift is recognizing that stainless fabrication for process equipment isn’t a commodity purchase. It’s an engineering problem that happens to involve metal. The fabrication has to be informed by process knowledge, hygienic design principles, thermal analysis, and an understanding of how the equipment will actually be cleaned, operated, and maintained over its full lifecycle. When those disciplines sit under one roof, equipment gets designed with buildability and long-term performance in mind from the start.

What an integrated approach actually requires

Moving from separated engineering and fabrication to a truly integrated model isn’t a matter of simply co-locating two teams. It requires a deliberate operating structure and a specific set of capabilities.

It starts with process knowledge. The engineering team needs deep fluency in the end-use application. Designing a cheese cooker that handles frozen curd on one side and 180°F steam on the other is fundamentally different from designing a pharmaceutical mixing vessel that must meet ASME BPE surface finish requirements. The process engineers need to understand the product, the cleaning regimens, the regulatory environment, and the failure modes specific to that application.

The facility itself matters just as much. Fabrication has to be a stainless-only operation, or at minimum, a facility with rigorous separation protocols. Cross-contamination between carbon steel and stainless is one of the most common and most preventable causes of premature equipment failure. When carbon molecules embed in a stainless surface during grinding, cutting, or handling, they create micro-corrosion sites that the cleaning process accelerates. A dedicated stainless facility eliminates that risk.

Capability on the shop floor has to match the complexity of the work. That means CNC-capable equipment across the full fabrication workflow: waterjet cutting, brake press forming, CNC lathes and mills, precision polishing (capable of taking mill finish to a No. 4 or better), and overhead crane capacity for heavy assemblies. This isn’t about having the biggest shop. It’s about having the right equipment to maintain tolerances and surface quality throughout the build process.

There’s also a growing need for reverse-engineering capability. When a client has a legacy component that’s gone obsolete (an OEM part that’s no longer manufactured, a proprietary fitting from a supplier that no longer exists), the fabrication partner needs a way to bring it back. Coordinate measuring machines (CMMs) can digitize an existing part down to thousandths of an inch, allowing the team to recreate or improve the original component without relying on drawings that may no longer exist.

The obstacles are real, but they’re solvable

The workforce challenge looms largest. Stainless welding, polishing, and assembly are specialized skills that take years to develop. The metal distorts unpredictably. It stress-cracks at joints if heat input isn’t carefully controlled. Achieving a hygienic-grade finish requires understanding not just the polishing equipment but the metallurgy of the surface itself.

The talent shortage is real, and it’s not going to reverse quickly. The most effective response is a combination of in-house training programs and partnerships with local technical colleges to build a pipeline of young fabricators who can learn from experienced mentors while the institutional knowledge still exists. Some forward-looking fabrication groups are donating scrap material and shop time to welding programs, creating a direct path from classroom to shop floor.

Then there’s the trust problem around proprietary equipment. Many manufacturers’ competitive advantages live inside their custom process equipment. A unique mixer design, a proprietary cutter configuration, a novel thermal treatment system: these are trade secrets in metal form. Sending that work to an outside fabrication shop means exposing intellectual property to a vendor who may serve competitors. The risk of IP leakage, or even the perception of it, keeps some operators from engaging the fabrication partners who could actually solve their equipment problems.

The answer is a fabrication partner that operates as a trusted extension of the client’s own engineering team, with confidentiality protocols, long-term relationships, and a track record of discretion built over years of proprietary work.

Speed compounds everything. When a bacterial contamination event or equipment failure takes a line down, the cost is measured in hours, not days. A fabrication partner that can mobilize a crew and begin executing a repair plan within 24 hours of a call isn’t a luxury. In some facilities, it’s the difference between a five-day recovery and a five-week one.

How Salas O’Brien can help

If you operate process equipment in food, beverage, pharma, or any hygienic manufacturing environment, Salas O’Brien’s stainless technologies team was built for the exact challenges described above.

Your proprietary equipment stays proprietary. Our team serves as the keeper of your technology: designing, fabricating, installing, and supporting custom equipment through its full lifecycle without exposing your IP to the open market. We’ve built long-term partnerships with manufacturers who trust us with their most sensitive process designs, and we treat that trust as foundational to everything we do.

Your engineering and fabrication happen under one roof. Our process engineers, mechanical engineers, and automation specialists work directly alongside our fabrication teams. That means the people designing your equipment understand how it will be built, and the people building it understand how it will operate. Together, they deliver a better piece of equipment with fewer misses in assembly, tighter tolerances, and solutions that account for real-world operating conditions from day one.

Your facility doesn’t wait. When a high-bacterial-count event or critical equipment failure puts production at risk, our team has demonstrated the ability to have a crew on the road and a game plan in execution within 24 hours. When every day of downtime carries a seven- or eight-figure cost, that kind of response is a requirement.

And when you need a partner who can see the full picture, from process piping and turnkey installations to procurement and commissioning, we are here for you. We bring a large amount of knowledge, specifically in hygienic manufacturing, and we hold our fabrication to a standard that, frankly, we haven’t seen matched at trade shows or in the open market.

If you’ve been living with equipment problems that no one has been able to crack, or if you’re planning a new line and want it built right the first time, that’s the work we do.

Reach out to discuss your project with one of our experts. Contact us at [email protected].

For media inquiries on this article, reach out to [email protected].

 

Contributors
Nick Turner

Nick Turner

Nick Turner is a leader in stainless technologies and fabrication. He delivers packaging and process upgrades for food, beverage, and industrial manufacturing clients worldwide, leading teams from planning through commissioning on greenfield builds and complex retrofits. Nick serves as director of operations for Salas O’Brien’s stainless technologies team. Contact him at [email protected].

All Posts

John Murphy

John Murphy

John Murphy leads a team of automation and robotics experts delivering practical solutions across food and beverage, consumer goods, paper, and pharmaceutical manufacturing. With more than 25 years of experience, he combines plant-floor perspective with engineering leadership. He began his career at a Fortune 500 manufacturer as a papermaking project engineer and later an electrical maintenance leader—experience that grounds his work in real-world operations and commissioning. John guides teams through complex automation projects from concept to startup, helping clients adapt to evolving technologies while improving reliability and performance. John serves as a Managing Principal at Salas O’Brien. Contact him at [email protected].

All Posts

David Mackedanz

David Mackedanz

David Mackedanz oversees fabrication of proprietary stainless steel equipment for food, beverage, pharma, and industrial clients, bringing extensive hands-on experience in welding, polishing, and precision machining of hygienic-grade stainless components. David serves as an operations supervisor for Salas O’Brien. Contact him at [email protected].

All Posts