News & Insights

Swapping out FD&C dyes for natural colorants, or eliminating artificial sweeteners in favor of cleaner alternatives, can ripple through an entire production environment. For many manufacturers, this is uncharted territory, and the stakes are high.

If executed correctly, a facility is positioned for the next decade of consumer demand. If executed incorrectly, reformulation can lead to costly rework, compliance exposure, or compromised product quality. Behind every product launch announcement is a facility team grappling with a much harder question: how do we meet these new requirements?

Success will require closely examining how ingredients are processed and stored, how sanitary design holds up, how a formula performs once it leaves the lab, whether utilities and packaging can keep pace, and how all of it fits within a plant that’s still running at full production. Manufacturers who start planning now are much better positioned to avoid rushed implementation, supply chain disruptions, and unexpected capital costs later.

Why reformulating for clean labels is harder than it sounds

Synthetic dyes and additives didn’t end up in food by accident. Manufacturers adopted them decades ago because they solved real production problems, such as:

• Brighter colors that held up on the shelf
• Longer windows before a product started to fade or spoil
• Processes that could run hot and fast without hurting quality

The challenge with removing them is that natural colorants can’t offer the same margin for error as their synthetic counterparts. Natural ingredients break down faster in light, heat, and oxygen, and they’re far more sensitive to the kind of physical stress a typical production line puts ingredients through.

That sensitivity narrows what engineers call the operating window, the range of conditions within which a process can run and still produce a consistent, high-quality product. A synthetic dye might tolerate wide swings in temperature or mixing speed without any visible change. A natural one often won’t, and that single idea is worth keeping in mind, because it shows up again in nearly every part of a facility this transition touches.

Manufacturers in parts of Europe have been operating under tighter constraints for years, running slower lines, accepting shorter shelf lives, and producing noticeably less vibrant versions of familiar products. That history is useful because it means American manufacturers aren’t inventing solutions from scratch. But the facilities, supply chains, and equipment built in the United States for synthetic ingredients weren’t designed with these constraints in mind, and closing that gap takes real engineering work.

This isn’t limited to candy or snacks, either. Pet food, dairy, beverages, and packaged meals are all undergoing a similar transition, so the operational lessons from one category tend to apply well beyond it.

Rethinking process and ingredient systems

The first thing manufacturers often discover is that a natural ingredient behaves differently at every stage of production, not just in the mixing bowl. Tighter tolerances for heat, shear, and pH mean processes that used to run at full speed may need to slow down or change sequence entirely.

One approach that has worked well is moving color addition to the very end of the production line rather than the beginning. This way, the ingredient avoids the cumulative heat and mechanical stress that would otherwise degrade it. It’s a simple change in sequence, but it can make the difference between a color that holds up and one that doesn’t.

Some manufacturers have created dedicated internal teams to oversee this transition, treating it less like a one-time reformulation project and more like an ongoing operational practice. That level of investment indicates this isn’t a problem to be solved once and left behind. It involves assessing where a facility stands in its overall transition, whether it’s still experimenting with formulas in a lab or already moving toward full-scale production, and whether the focus is a single product line or a company-wide change. Clarifying that early helps determine which systems need priority attention.

The general trend across these systems shows a shift from bulk, ambient processing toward a more pharmaceutical-grade approach: closed, low-oxygen environments, improved batching precision, and additional steps such as encapsulation or buffering to protect inherently less stable ingredients.

What works in the lab doesn’t always work on the floor

A formula that performs beautifully in a pilot environment doesn’t always survive the jump to commercial production. This gap catches more teams off guard than almost anything else in a reformulation project.

Pilot plants are typically run by small teams working under close, careful control, watching every variable as it moves through the process. Production floors operate under a completely different set of pressures. Operators and plant managers are measured on hitting a target output, not on protecting the nuances of a new formulation, and that mismatch in incentives can undo months of careful formulation work in a single shift.

The math behind this is more concrete than it might sound. A natural color that holds its shade for six months when a line runs at a controlled, moderate speed might only last three months if that same line runs twenty percent faster. The product coming off the line can look identical at the end of the shift, and the problem doesn’t show up until the color starts to fade weeks later on a retail shelf. That’s exactly the kind of surprise that can lead to a costly recall or a quality complaint long after the production run is finished.

The manufacturers who avoid this outcome invest in pilot testing and stability modeling before they scale up, treating the jump from lab to line as its own engineering problem rather than an assumption that a working formula will simply carry over. That upfront work costs time, but it’s far cheaper than discovering the gap after a product has already shipped.

Storage, handling, and the shrinking shelf-life window

Natural ingredients often require a level of storage care that synthetic ingredients don’t. Powders and liquids that once sat comfortably in ambient warehouse conditions may now require refrigeration or freezing to slow degradation caused by heat and light. That, in turn, changes how ingredients move onto the line, since frozen or chilled materials typically need to be brought back up to temperature before they can be used.

The bigger challenge is often what happens to shelf life on both ends of the process. Once a natural colorant or additive is produced, its usable window starts shrinking immediately, and that clock keeps running once it’s incorporated into a finished product.

The result is a supply chain that must move faster and carry less inventory at every step. Suppliers now face stricter storage requirements to protect ingredients that degrade faster than their synthetic counterparts. Because of this, manufacturers must plan tighter, smaller production runs rather than stockpiling a year’s worth of a single ingredient.

Sanitary design gets more demanding, not less

It’s a common misconception that natural ingredients simplify a plant’s hygiene requirements. In practice, the opposite tends to be true.

Synthetic dyes and additives are essentially inert, so equipment handling them rarely needed frequent sanitizing. Organic, plant-based ingredients change that. They introduce real microbial risk, which means dosing equipment that once ran for months without a deep clean may now need attention every shift.

Allergens add another layer of complexity. A colorant or preservative sourced from a plant can carry allergen risk that its synthetic predecessor didn’t, even in a product a customer has eaten safely for years. A practical question to consider is whether a new formula:

• Strains equipment
• Clings to surfaces
• Changes how existing cleaning chemistry works on valves, hoses, and gaskets

Getting ahead of these questions during planning, rather than during a validation run, saves both time and product.

Remember utilities and packaging

Utility systems rarely come up first in a reformulation conversation, but they tend to become a constraint fast. Water treatment, HVAC, and thermal systems shift from simply supporting production to actively protecting product integrity. This often means tighter humidity and temperature control, better filtration, and more precise heating and cooling than the facility currently provides.

The practical question worth asking early is whether existing utilities have the capacity to absorb this new load or are already running close to their limits. Finding that out during planning is far better than discovering it during startup.

Packaging deserves the same early attention. Natural colors are more vulnerable to light, oxygen, and heat, which often shortens shelf life and calls for opaque or UV-blocking materials with stronger oxygen barriers. Formula changes can also affect how a product behaves on the line itself, from fill accuracy to sealing to overall line speed. Treating packaging as a late-stage decision, once the formulation is locked, tends to lead to expensive surprises.

Modernizing while maintaining operations

Very few manufacturers are building a new plant just to change an ingredient. Almost all of this work happens inside existing, operating facilities, which brings its own set of trade-offs. Floor space is limited, legacy equipment wasn’t designed with sensitive ingredients in mind, and there’s a constant tension between maintaining high production speed and protecting product quality.

A phased approach tends to work better than an all-at-once overhaul. Breaking a project into stages lets a manufacturer manage capital spending and downtime deliberately, testing changes at one site or line before rolling them out across the operation, rather than betting the whole operation on a single transition.

Facing the trade-offs honestly

Clean label goals and sustainability goals don’t always point in the same direction, and pretending otherwise is a recipe for disappointment. A shorter shelf life can mean more waste. Tighter temperature control can mean more energy use. Slower lines, like those described earlier, mean lower throughput.

But none of these are signs that a project has gone wrong. They’re often the practical realities of moving to non-artificial systems, and treating them as expected trade-offs rather than failures makes it easier to plan around them.

Quality standards may also need to shift. A shade of green or red that customers have come to expect from a synthetic dye may simply not be achievable with a natural one, at least not without accepting a shorter shelf life or a slower production line.

The manufacturers who navigate this well are the ones who get engineering, quality, packaging, and operations talking early, before a product is already committed to a launch date. Those who struggle tend to treat reformulation as a research and development problem alone, only to discover the facility implications after it’s too late to plan around them.

How can Salas O’Brien Help?

You don’t have to navigate this shift alone. Reformulating away from artificial dyes and additives affects nearly every part of your facility, from ingredient handling and sanitary design to utilities, packaging, automation, and how your lines run day-to-day.

We bring end-to-end expertise across formulation support, process engineering, utilities, packaging, automation, facility design, and quality and hygiene considerations, with a strong track record of modernizing plants already up and running without disrupting production while work is underway. Our experience spans:

• Food and beverages
• Pet food
• Consumer packaged goods
• Nutraceuticals
• Cosmetics
• Pharmaceuticals

We believe this kind of project works best as a partnership, not a transaction. Many of the companies facing this decision built their businesses on a product their families or founders created, and trusting an outside team with that product requires a real relationship, not just technical capability.

Anyone can help you pick a natural ingredient. We make sure your plant can run it consistently, safely, and profitably. If your team is working through what this transition means for your facility, reach out and let’s talk through what a practical path forward looks like.

For media inquiries on this article, reach out to [email protected].